The ADDIE model seems to be the one which is presently most used in preparing online education materials. The five parts of ADDIE are:
A - Analysis
D - Design
D - Development
I - Implementation
E - Evaluation

The analysis stage is a needs analysis in which it should be found out, just what do our participants need to learn, what do they already know and what are the objectives for this piece of training. In the case of my APBOT webinar this question is irrelevant, one could however say the need is to be informed about the theory and practice of mobile learning.
In the design stage decisions have to be made about the format the training will be provided in, what content will be used, and a protoype has to be created.
The development stage is concerned with implemented the requirements listed in the design stage. In the case of e-learning this is also the stage where courses or software should be tested and debugged/corrected. This is the stage my webinar is at, at the moment.
The next stage is the implementation stage which is when everything is set up to deliver the training. Once I have completed my presentation this will be the stage where I upload it to Elluminate and ensure everything is working correctly before I begin the webinar.
Finally, in the evaluation phase presents the opportunity for the creator to evaluate the training themselves as well as giving the participants to provide their own feedback. At the moment I am working on an evaluation form to give everyone at the end of my webinar. This will be produced using the forms function of google docs.
Another very interesting model I discovered is the OAR model which is special in that it was specifically designed for distance learning in higher education.

In this case the name is an abbreviation for objectives, activities and resources. This model is appealing as it seems very simple and straightforward. However, unlike the ADDIE model it does not include any specific area for gaining feedback and evaluating the training.
I found these and the other models I looked at to be fascinated and I am sure there is no one ideal model which fits all circumstances. For my webinar, podcast and future e-learning projects I will therefore take a look at several more models and use the components which seem to meet my needs best. There is here, as always, a lot more reading to be done!
Neil
Sources:
Chaudry, M.A. & Rahman, F.U. (2010) A critical review of instructional design process of distance learning system, Turkish online journal of distance education, Vol. 11, Number. 3.
https://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde39/articles/article_11.htm [accessed 12.3.2012]
Instructional design models and theories, http://www.instructionaldesigncentral.com/htm/IDC_instructionaldesignmodels.htm [accessed 12.03.2012]
ADDIE instructional design model, http://www.intulogy.com/addie/ [accessed 12.03.2012]
OAR model, http://www.enotes.com/topic/OAR_model [accessed 12.03.2012]
Hi Neil
AntwortenLöschenI hope everything is shaping up nicely for your guest expert webinar next week! I'm sure it is, and look forward to hearing where you're at with the preparation in this week's Virtual Office Hours session.
Thanks for the work you've so far put into both this, and your mentoring activities with Nicky.
Thanks also for your reflective blog posts to date, which I think are documenting well your journey through the Applied Practice in Blended and Online Teaching module.
It is good to see how your posts have moved from general to specific issues as your ideas have taken shape, and you have got further into the applied teaching practice itself. Particularly encouraging is your increasing engagement with the literature as you've gone along, and your latest post where you start to address well the pedagogical considerations around the design of your applied teaching activities.
In terms of offering formative feedback to consider in pulling together your final Patchwork Text, then I'd encourage you to continue building upon the direction you've taken in your latest post to make strong links between what you are doing with your webinar and mentoring activities, and what the literature describes as good practice.
Consider also this area of the Patchwork Text specification:
---
Reflective account of module related activities (25 %)
You are expected to submit a reflective, critical commentary on your personal growth, development and ability as a blended and online educator in which you must draw directly from your teaching, training, developmental and or support activities undertaken as part of your agreed focus for the APBOT module. In addition you are expected to link these experiences either with your aspirations for the future as an educator or explore the implications these may have for the wider education community.
---
There is plenty of time to write more in around the above area, but start to think about these wider developmental issues.
Talk soon!
Keith
Hi Keith,
AntwortenLöschenmany thanks for the detailed and constructive feedback. I will definitely try to follow your advice and concentrate on the areas you mentioned.
The module has been very interesting and enjoyable do far and I am sure it will remain so.
Best regards,
Neil